Hoo was a centralized cryptocurrency exchange offering spot/futures trading, OTC services, and custodial solutions before collapsing in 2025. It supported 400+ trading pairs and leveraged trading up to 100x.
Country: Cayman Islands
Year Stablished: 2019
Type: Centralized Exchange
URL: https://www.hoo.com
Deposit methods:
US Allowed: No
Offer Derivatives: Yes
Maker: 0.2%
Taker: 0.2%
Withrawal Fee: Varies by asset (network fees)
With KYC | Without KYC | ||
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawal Limit | Unavailable (withdrawals suspended) | Unavailable (withdrawals suspended) | Day |
Minimum deposit size:
Cryptocurrency exchanges have become vital gateways in the digital asset ecosystem, and Hoo Exchange was once an emerging player in this space. I've been following crypto exchanges for years, and Hoo had some interesting features that made it stand out. Let's dive into what this platform offered and what eventually happened to it.
Remember when everyone was scrambling to manage multiple crypto wallets across different blockchains? Hoo attempted to solve this headache by supporting multiple public chains including BTC, ETH, EOS, NEO, and TRX, along with thousands of tokens. The platform positioned itself as a convenient asset management solution for cryptocurrency users.
Registered in the Cayman Islands and headquartered in Hong Kong, Hoo built a substantial operation with over 400 spot trading pairs and claimed a processing capacity of 10,000 transactions per second. Not too shabby for what started as a relatively unknown exchange.
One trader I spoke with mentioned how Hoo's interface made it easy to toggle between percentage-based trading amounts (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%), which was actually pretty handy when making quick trades during volatile market conditions.
Before its eventual collapse, Hoo offered several features that attracted traders:
Competitive Fee Structure: Hoo charged a flat 0.20% trading fee with VIP-based discounts for higher-volume traders. In an industry where fees can eat into profits, this was relatively competitive.
High-Leverage Trading: For the risk-takers (or the foolhardy, depending on your perspective), Hoo offered futures trading with up to 100x leverage. I've always thought this level of leverage is like handing a flamethrower to someone in a fireworks factory, but it certainly attracted the more aggressive traders.
Security Measures: The exchange claimed to maintain 98% of assets in offline cold storage before its operational collapse, which was in line with industry best practices for security.
Global OTC Services: Hoo operated more than 200 OTC service locations globally, providing options for users to convert between fiat and crypto.
Hoo Smart Chain: The exchange even operated its own blockchain focused on metaverse projects until its 2025 shutdown.
Like many crypto exchange collapses I've witnessed (and unfortunately, there have been too many), Hoo's demise followed a familiar pattern. The first red flag appeared when users began reporting inability to withdraw funds, with withdrawal interfaces being disabled for months.
The situation took a dramatic turn in early 2025 when Hoo halted all withdrawals and eventually took down its website, effectively locking up user funds. If that sounds familiar, it's because we've seen this movie before with exchanges like FTX, Mt. Gox, and others.
Behind the scenes, things were even messier. In 2025, founder Rexy Wang publicly accused executive Fang Wenbin of stealing assets. Nothing says "trustworthy financial institution" like executives publicly accusing each other of theft, right?
The exchange even attempted a desperate "debt-to-token" initiative before completely shutting down, which predictably failed to resolve the situation.
Interestingly, Hoo's collapse coincided with major regulatory changes in its jurisdictions:
Hong Kong implemented new OTC licensing requirements in February 2025, which impacted unregulated exchanges like Hoo.
The Cayman Islands introduced mandatory crypto licensing starting April 2025, requiring compliance from Hoo as a registered entity.
These regulatory changes likely contributed to Hoo's decision to shut down rather than comply with stricter oversight. I've seen this pattern before—when regulations tighten, exchanges with questionable practices often fold rather than face scrutiny.
One concerning aspect was Hoo's handling of KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements. The exchange required mandatory KYC verification for withdrawals, and during the collapse, users were forced to re-verify—a process that seemed designed to delay withdrawals rather than enhance security.
A trader I interviewed mentioned how the platform initially seemed user-friendly, with easy wallet-to-trading account transfers, but later revealed its true colors when withdrawal requests went unanswered for weeks.
If there's anything I've learned from watching exchanges like Hoo collapse, it's that in crypto, "not your keys, not your coins" isn't just a catchy phrase—it's financial survival advice.
The Hoo situation reminds us to:
Hoo Exchange's trajectory from promising multi-chain wallet solution to another failed crypto exchange serves as yet another cautionary tale in the cryptocurrency space. While it offered innovative features and competitive pricing, the lack of transparency, regulatory compliance issues, and internal disputes eventually led to its downfall.
For users still hoping to recover funds from Hoo, the outlook unfortunately remains bleak based on similar historical cases. If you're one of the affected users, documenting your losses and joining class action efforts might be your best recourse—though I wouldn't hold my breath.
Features
Use Cases
Help & Support
All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025.